After a little break, I wanted to direct people to interesting articles/news items. Both originate from Digital Book World. The first is on DRM, article here; the second is on self-publishing, article here.
When Does Digital Rights Make Sense?
This news item pulls from John Schember’s article “DRM-It’s all about lock-in” at Teleread. He basically looks at the question of DRM from the stand point of … “When does it make sense? He focuses on the five major parties affected by DRM: readers, stores, DRM vendors, publishers and authors. His basic conclusion is that DRM is not necessary unless one is dealing with a library or subscription service.
I agree with his conclusions. I especially like how he simplifies the answer to his question: When Does Digital Rights Make Sense? The answer lies in perceived ownership. If you buy a book, you perceive (and in actuality) you own that book. If it is a physical copy, it is now yours to do with as you please – read it, lend it, etc. The same should be true of an ebook as well. People know the basic laws and publishers/authors/retailers should be suing the violators and not punishing everyone else for cumbersome requirements.
On the other hand, if you are checking out an ebook from a library or from a subscription service, the perceived/acknowledged owner is the library (actually the lending service as Kansas is finding out should have happened with Overdrive) or that subscription service provider. Here it makes sense to have DRM. It mitigates length of time to read and what can be done with the book. After all, the reader does not own the book.
Again, I agree with John’s conclusion and should be the standard for publishing.
One side thought though – If I own a book and have a garage sale, can’t I sell that book? Presumably, the same is not true for ebooks? Just a thought.
I thought this was interesting information. Basically, self-publishing is getting spamed. People are maliciously “publishing” ebooks trying to make money off of their scam, especially (at least the article seems to indicate) on Amazon.
While I completely disagree with the concept as unethical and immoral, can we really be surprised this happened. Spam seems to occur in everything digital. However, I think the market place will help take care of this as Amazon and other vendors learn from this issue and tighten their approval process.
One thought, could a vendor use something like the wiki concept? In a wiki everyone (or at least registered/approved people) can change, add and/or delete information. Could a vendor have something similar where people can delete the book from sales? I assume there is also a reporting process involved. Should be interesting to watch.